"Nutzt Wettbewerb auf den Schienen dem Kunden?"
Von: Edmund Lauterbach (e.lauterbach@gmx.de) [Profil]
Datum: 27.05.2008 12:16
Message-ID: <218fdd4c-fada-4ca7-bb1e-4cfc9ed25a75@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: de.etc.bahn.bahnpolitik
Datum: 27.05.2008 12:16
Message-ID: <218fdd4c-fada-4ca7-bb1e-4cfc9ed25a75@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: de.etc.bahn.bahnpolitik
Unter dem Titel "Nutzt Wettbewerb auf den Schienen dem Kunden?" widmet sich die heutige SZ dem Thema Bahn und Wettbewerb. Der Artikel beruft sich auf zwei wissensschaftliche Abhandlungen, die ich mal im Orginal rausgesucht habe: | Exploring the Effects of Competition for Railway Markets | | Rafael Lalive, University of Zürich, CESifo and IZA | Armin Schmutzler,University of Zürich, CEPR and ENCORE | | Abstract: This paper studies the effects of introducing competition | for local passenger railway markets in the German state of Baden- | Württemberg. We compare the evolution of the frequency of service on | lines that were exposed to competition for the market with lines | procured by direct negotiations with the incumbent. Our results | suggest that the competitively procured lines enjoyed a stronger | growth of the frequency of service than those that were not procured | competitively, even after controlling for various line characteristics | that might have had an independent influence on the frequency of | service. Our results further suggest that the effects of competition | may depend strongly on the operator. http://www.soi.uzh.ch/research/wp/2005/wp0511.pdf | Entry in Liberalized Railway Markets: The German Experience | | RAFAEL LALIVE, Department of Economics, University of Lausanne | ARMIN SCHMUTZLER, Socioeconomic Institute, University of Zurich | | Abstract | In Germany, competitive franchising is increasingly being used to | procure passenger railway services that were previously provided by | a state monopolist. This paper analyzes 77 tenders that differ with | respect to network size, service frequency, contract duration and | the proximity to other lines that are already run by competitors of | DB Regio, a subsidiary of the successor of the former state monopolist. | Our analysis shows that competitors are more likely to win small | networks and more recent auctions. Other controls such as contract | duration and the adjacency to other lines run by entrants are | insignificant. http://www.rnejournal.com/articles/lalive_et_al_RNE_march08.pdf Schönen Gruß, Edmund Lauterbach[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Lko Willms (27.05.2008 13:43)
- Hannes Kuhnert (28.05.2008 11:45)
- Lko Willms (29.05.2008 11:28)
- Edmund Lauterbach (29.05.2008 15:04)
- Hans-Joachim Zierke (02.06.2008 03:33)
- Dicki Hoppenstedt (02.06.2008 09:01)
- K.H?ller (02.06.2008 15:21)
- Dicki Hoppenstedt (02.06.2008 16:00)
- Hans-Joachim Zierke (02.06.2008 19:27)
- Hans-Joachim Zierke (04.06.2008 04:23)
- Edmund Lauterbach (04.06.2008 08:54)
- Reinhard Greulich (04.06.2008 09:59)
- Hans-Joachim Zierke (04.06.2008 10:51)
- Edmund Lauterbach (04.06.2008 12:05)
- Hans-Joachim Zierke (04.06.2008 12:59)
- Dicki Hoppenstedt (04.06.2008 14:32)
- Johannes Picht (03.06.2008 21:08)
- Hans-Joachim Zierke (04.06.2008 01:18)
- Johannes Picht (04.06.2008 06:58)
- Hans-Joachim Zierke (05.06.2008 21:04)
- Johannes Picht (05.06.2008 22:12)
- Matthias Warkus (05.06.2008 23:57)
